• Frontpage
  • Bloggers
  • Archive
  • About
Inside

The effect of brand function if an advertisement fails: One minute and 49 seconds that cost $8 billion, by Anne Liikanen

15.06.2021 Alumni, Entrepreneurship



Expectations for the man and the role of the man have undergone a drastic change in recent decades. Simultaneously the role and influence of the consumer has become increasingly influential as the Internet enabling two-way communication. As well-being has increased, ethical values have been emphasized in terms of consumers behavior adding new kinds of pressure on companies to respond to consumers’ changing behavior. All of these changes together resulted in a series of events in which Gillette’s marketing, Gillette’s brand and consumer power were re-evaluated based on a single advertisement.

The contradictory feedback Gilette received by company’s “The Best a Man Can Be” – advertisement provides an opportunity to assess the consumer’s expectations for a brand whilst the risks of company’s brand changes in a rapidly changing world. As consumers´ media literacy improves, the messages created by marketing are quickly broken into pieces and their authenticity assessed. This contradiction: the pursuit of commercial gain and at the same time the pursuit of authenticity and ethics is universally interesting and important phenomena.

The research investigates the effect of brand functions as defined by Jean-Noël Kapferer on advertising, focusing on a poorly received advertising campaign. The material was sourced from YouTube for the advertisement: “The Best a Man Can Be” by Gillette. The negative reactions of the public regarding the campaign are explored through three different research questions by using content analysis as a research method. Comments are categorized by using Kapferer’s functions as a classification frame. The intention is to understand the relationship of Kapferer’s brand functions to consumers‘ reactions in this particular case.

The ad was intended to spark a debate about toxic masculinity. It did that, the audience was discussing the topic but the ad also raised discussion about Gillette’s motives releasing the ad and more broadly: discussion about Gillette’s ethics in general. There were many, who agreed with the ad’s message but didn’t like the way the message was told and more importantly – by who the message was told. As a result of that Gillette got lots of publicity, mostly negative. In the comment field there were messages reminding of Procter&Gample’s ethically problematic past: alleged child labor, use of palm oil, destroying rain forest, corruption. At the same time Gillette reported $8 billion loss and “The Best a Man can be” -campaign was seen as one of the reasons for losses.

The analysis of the comments showed that advertising based on ethics evokes an evaluation of the ethical function in consumers. The analysis also showed that brand functions are working against the brand as easily as they are working for the brand. Brand advocates easily turn to boycotters if they feel offended. Both the brand advocates and the boycotters will receive their badges, badges are just coming from different directions.

Somewhat surprising phenomenon was that commenting was partly political. This may be because the topic of the ad was seen partly political. It is also possible that the forthcoming presidential election was the reason for the politicization of discussion. It is also possible that politically active people are even more specific about what kind of companies they will be connected to as consumers. The people who are confident enough to comment on a YouTube video’s comment field may also correlate with people with strong and vocal political opinions.


The study examines consumers’ reactions to a particular type of advertisement, so the results say nothing about the general reactions of consumers. Given this limitation into account, it can be said that this research brings new insights into how the consumer reacts to seemingly ill-fitting advertisement campaigns. Through analyzing the comments, it can be observed that the brand functions, as stated by Jean-Noël Kapferer, seem to be working both for and against the company’s ideals in equal measures. Furthermore, from this study it can also be ascertained that in addition to Kapferer’s eight brand functions there is also a political brand function as people seem to care about what political profile their consumption reflects. People seem to want to be profiled politically also as consumers.

One interesting topic for further research would be to find out how the forthcoming political (e.g. presidential) elections appear on Internet discussion forums in general. Based on this research, it could be argued that there is a lot of political power struggle in comments that have no visible political significance. If this assumption is true, this phenomenon may have far-reaching effects for social influence. Social media in general has grown into a significant channel of influence and it is therefore important to continue to study its impact also from the political point of view.


Kultur och media / Culture and Media / Kulttuuri ja media

I en virvelvind av förändringar och ett hav av möjligheter utforskar och ger skribenter till bloggen Kultur och medier mening åt vårt dynamiska område. Läs om de senaste trenderna, händelserna och akademiska argumenten som formar och omformar vår värld på ett sätt som uppmuntrar oss att reflektera och debattera över vad som har hänt och vad som ännu inte har hänt. In a whirlwind of change, and a sea of possibilities, contributors to the Culture and Media blog explore and make meaning of our dynamic field. Read about the latest trends, events and academic arguments that are shaping and reshaping our world in ways that encourage us to reflect and debate on what has past and what has yet to come.

Contact details

  • E-mail: kmblogg_redaktion@arcada.fi

More by the same author

  • 18.05.2022 How can small museums innovate on digitalisation?
  • 30.11.2021 Boom-boom-boomer – kolla hit, detta är politik!
  • 29.11.2021 Silmän liikkeiden tutkimisesta – osa 2
  • 05.10.2021 En Filmproduktion i startgropen: av Robert Nordström
  • 27.08.2021 Havaintoja elokuvan leikkaamisesta, OSA1. Kirjottanut Kauko Lindfors
More posts by Kultur och media / Culture and Media / Kulttuuri ja media

AuthorKultur och media / Culture and Media / Kulttuuri ja media

Tagsbrand, Social media

Meet our bloggers

Business / Business / Liiketalous

  • 28.04.2022
    Vem köper mat på nätet i framtiden?

Arcada 25

  • 21.04.2022
    Därför är innovativt entreprenörskapstänk en framgångsfaktor
  • 31.03.2022
    Digitala tvillingar inom ingenjörsvetenskapen – vad är det och varför behöver vi dem?
  • 11.03.2022
    Människan, robotik och AI

International Student Ambassadors

  • 03.02.2022
    Arcada – A Truly International Experience in Helsinki
  • 06.12.2021
    Why I Chose Finland as My Study Destination (and Would Do It All Over Again)
  • 09.02.2021
    Two Things You Should Know About Studying in Finland and at Arcada

Arcada Research News

  • 21.10.2021
    Märi-projektet framskrider och når delmål
  • 01.06.2021
    Lohkoketjuekosysteeminen tarkastelua hallinnan ja adoption näkökulmasta
  • 19.02.2021
    MäRi – sociala robotar som agenter i vården

The NURED Project

  • 28.02.2020
    Ending the NURED Project: final products, and final thoughts.
  • 30.09.2019
    The NURED Final Seminar – WELCOME!
  • 13.06.2019
    The NURED Roadtrip – Discussions about developing nursing curriculas across the Baltic Region

Kultur och media / Culture and Media / Kulttuuri ja media

  • 18.05.2022
    How can small museums innovate on digitalisation?
  • 30.11.2021
    Boom-boom-boomer – kolla hit, detta är politik!
  • 29.11.2021
    Silmän liikkeiden tutkimisesta – osa 2

Cookies Availability statement

© 2022 Yrkeshögskolan Arcada