• Frontpage
  • Bloggers
  • Archive
  • About
Inside

How Do I Perform? A blogpost from the 14th disciplinary Conference on Intangibles and Intellectual Capital, Munich, Germany

19.11.2018 Education, Research

Tomas Träskman, ProPrefekt and Lecturer in Cultural Management, Department of Culture and Media, Arcada UAS

“The Consequences of Intangibles” is the subject of Prof. Baruch Lev’s keynote. I sit and listen. As his story unfolds, and we dig deeper into the fascinating, but sometimes very abstract, world of intangibles, I reflect on my own performance as a worker involved with value that is mainly intangible, and I seem to be performing… incredibly WELL. In a presentation on the benefits from moving from a manufacturing economy into today’s market of intangibles, Lev observes that the benefits are large and widely dispersed. These benefits include 1) democratization of information, 2) the rise of social media (for better or worse), 3) huge advances in media & entertainment and transportation, 4) huge health gains throughout the world from pharmaceutical R&D. He also identifies that five intangible-intensive companies, Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Netflix and Google (FAANG), move the US markets. We now live in the Age of Faang. Arts such as music (Spotify) and TV (HBO), culture, and craft (Etsy (External link)) stand at the heart of the new corporations. Since the craft of making meaning is core to the institution of Culture and Media, at Arcada UAS, where I work, we seem to be performing really, really well. However, we all know that translating the value and work in the arts into the kind of economic capital that the market recognizes as legitimate, is not as simple as one would think. As Bruce Sterling notes in “Australian Culture versus the FAANG (Sterling, 2016)” that the outcome of the democratization of information is millions of views, shares and likes, with followers counted in the hundreds of thousands. This is fantastic, as it creates not only new audiences, but also new professions. For example, in terms of my main responsibility at Arcada, the education of cultural managers, the result of this phenomenon, is that I find my students and alumni in new professions as ‘community managers’ and managing influencers. Another result, highlighted by Sterling, is that we are witnessing:

a massive redistribution of wealth from the cultural sector, where meaning is created, to the technology sector, which has figured out how to market, distribute, reach and make money out of it in ways the cultural industries never imagined possible.

By a fantastic trick of dissociation and decoupling, attention (and capital) is turned away from the source of the intangibles of meaning making and on the technology sector. In terms of investment, this is interesting, since if you are an investor where should your money go? According to Lev, many of the consequences of intangibles are things that we do not understand well enough, and therefore he gave one of his books the provocative title “The End of Accounting.” Thus, major decisions are predicated on financial indicators of profitability and asset/liabilities values. These documents move mountains, so what happens if they are based on faulty indicators that fail to show the true value of the company, he asks. According to Lev, we should look at “future performance”, for example investments in R&D. In a critical comment, one of the chairs from the conference, Prof. Dr. Manfred Schwaiger, from the Institute for Market-based Management (IMM) at Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich however problematized such indicators. At least in part.

Schwaiger acknowledged the need for better predictors. He gave the example of his own university, which as most universities wants to be: ‘the best university in the world.’ So how do they work towards this goal? Their logic is a common one: if you attract the best students, then you become the best university. Simplified: good students are the asset that universities capitalize on. However, this predictor is not a very good one by any measure. According to Schwaiger there is only a 25 % correlation between school grades and success in life. That is shocking news to me. Is this not the indicator that everyone, from ministry representatives to universities and UAS, present in terms of objective efficiency and prosperity? But if only 1 of 4 students actually is an asset and actually performs according to this logic, what does that mean for our future performance?

tomas.traskman@arcada.fi

 

Kultur och media / Culture and Media / Kulttuuri ja media

This blog is now on arcada.fi I en virvelvind av förändringar och ett hav av möjligheter utforskar och ger skribenter till bloggen Kultur och medier mening åt vårt dynamiska område. Läs om de senaste trenderna, händelserna och akademiska argumenten som formar och omformar vår värld på ett sätt som uppmuntrar oss att reflektera och debattera över vad som har hänt och vad som ännu inte har hänt. In a whirlwind of change, and a sea of possibilities, contributors to the Culture and Media blog explore and make meaning of our dynamic field. Read about the latest trends, events and academic arguments that are shaping and reshaping our world in ways that encourage us to reflect and debate on what has past and what has yet to come.

E-mail: kmblogg_redaktion@arcada.fi

Contact details

More by the same author

  • 09.01.2023 Corona, never forget
  • 21.12.2022 Exploring value co-creation and brand loyalty in online communities in China.
  • 08.12.2022 Humanisation of Media on Social Media
  • 02.12.2022 Podcasting and Finnish higher education
  • 22.11.2022 Visual Communication and Digital Media: Exploring the Science behind Visual Communication, and the Effects of Visual Media
More posts by Kultur och media / Culture and Media / Kulttuuri ja media

AuthorKultur och media / Culture and Media / Kulttuuri ja media

Tagsperformance; indicators; faang

Meet our bloggers

International Student Ambassadors

  • 27.04.2023
    Vappu – Finland’s most thrilling and adventurous national holiday
  • 24.01.2023
    Arcada – A Sustainable Study Choice in Helsinki, Finland
  • 04.01.2023
    Nursing studies at Arcada: safe and culture-friendly with high-quality teaching

Arcada 25

  • 23.03.2023
    Samarbete mellan företag och högskola – risk eller möjlighet?
  • 08.02.2023
    Unga studenter – vi behöver tänka i entreprenöriella banor!
  • 05.12.2022
    Lösningarna finns i samarbetet mellan människan och AI

Arcada Research News

  • 15.03.2023
    Key factors for successful collaboration identified in the SMARTNET project
  • 10.03.2023
    Student blog: European Convention on Human Rights and the Protection of Private Life, Freedom of Expression and Access to Information in a Digital Age
  • 15.06.2022
    News from Arcada’s Laboratory for Trustworthy AI

The NURED Project

  • 28.02.2020
    Ending the NURED Project: final products, and final thoughts.
  • 30.09.2019
    The NURED Final Seminar – WELCOME!
  • 13.06.2019
    The NURED Roadtrip – Discussions about developing nursing curriculas across the Baltic Region

Ergoterapi

  • 02.02.2023
    Ergoterapi-interventioner för ledgångsreumatism och De Quervains syndrom
  • 02.02.2023
    CRPS – Vad är det och hur kan ergoterapeuter jobba med smärtpatienter?
  • 31.05.2022
    Ergoterapi ur ett föräldraperspektiv, föräldraskap ur ett ergoterapiperspektiv

Energy and Material Technology labs

  • 17.05.2022
    DIGIMANU2 – Digital utveckling av Arcadas ingenjörsutrymmen
  • 18.02.2021
    DIGIMANU – Digitala laboratoriemiljöer
  • 17.07.2020
    Our new research project ‘’ALL-IN for Plastics Recycling’’ at its start phase

Cookies Availability statement

© 2023 Yrkeshögskolan Arcada